thegoodlannister:

a game of where the fuck did you get that character interpretation

Men: If Orange is the New Black is so good with representation, why are all the men horrible?
Women: They're not all horrible. Bennett's nice. What more do you want?
Men: But he's clueless and irresponsible! And that's just ONE guy! How can you give me ONE decent male character in a slew of diverse female characters and call THAT representation?
Women:
Women:
Women:
Women:
Women:
Women:
Women: ...must be tough.

wigglytuffer:

sorry i can’t go to school my earphones aren’t working

(Source: wigglytuffer)

sagefae:

Body Goals: Avatar Korra

astronemma:

Saturn was really close in the sky to the Moon tonight! Here’s what I got with my ‘scope and phone camera. 

mindblowingscience:

This Massive Planet Is Causing Its Parent Star To Age Prematurely

There’s a gas giant located about 330 light-years from here that’s not only unusually large, it’s also orbiting its host star at an incredibly close distance. According to a new study, this combination of factors is wreaking havoc on the star’s innards.
The exoplanet is named WASP-18b and it’s about 10 times heavier than Jupiter. So this thing is absolutely huge. Not only that, it’s so close to its parent star, WASP-18, that it completes one single orbit in less than 23 hours. It’s one of the most extreme examples of a hot Jupiter that scientists have ever seen.
A team led by Ignazio Pillitteri of the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF)-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo in Italy dated WASP-18 between 500 million and 2 billion years old. That’s young by cosmological standards. By comparison, our sun, which is at its mid-life, is about 5 billion years old.
But here’s the thing: Younger stars tend to be more active, spewing out stronger magnetic fields, larger flares, and more intense X-ray emissions than their older counterparts. That’s why things are weird with WASP-18. The Chandra X-Ray Observatory explains:

Magnetic activity, flaring, and X-ray emission are linked to the star’s rotation, which generally declines with age. However, when astronomers took a long look with Chandra at WASP-18 they didn’t detect any X-rays. Using established relations between the magnetic activity and X-ray emission of stars, as well as its actual age, researchers determined WASP-18 is about 100 times less active than it should be.
"We think the planet is aging the star by wreaking havoc on its innards," said co-author Scott Wolk of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The researchers argue that tidal forces created by the gravitational pull of the massive planet – similar to those the moon has on Earth’s tides, but on a much larger scale – may have disrupted the magnetic field of the star. [emphasis added]
The strength of the magnetic field depends on the amount of convection in the star, or how intensely hot gas stirs the interior of the star.
"The planet’s gravity may cause motions of gas in the interior of the star that weaken the convection," said co-author Salvatore Sciortino also of INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo in Italy. "This has a domino effect that results in the magnetic field becoming weaker and the star to age prematurely."

WASP-18 is particularly vulnerable to the impact of tidal forces owing to its convection zone, which is narrower than most stars.
Read the entire study at the pre-print journal arXiv: “No X-rays from WASP-18. Implications for its age, activity, and the influence of its massive hot Jupiter”.
Image: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/I.Pillitteri et al; Optical: DSS; Illustration: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

mindblowingscience:

This Massive Planet Is Causing Its Parent Star To Age Prematurely

There’s a gas giant located about 330 light-years from here that’s not only unusually large, it’s also orbiting its host star at an incredibly close distance. According to a new study, this combination of factors is wreaking havoc on the star’s innards.

The exoplanet is named WASP-18b and it’s about 10 times heavier than Jupiter. So this thing is absolutely huge. Not only that, it’s so close to its parent star, WASP-18, that it completes one single orbit in less than 23 hours. It’s one of the most extreme examples of a hot Jupiter that scientists have ever seen.

A team led by Ignazio Pillitteri of the Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF)-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo in Italy dated WASP-18 between 500 million and 2 billion years old. That’s young by cosmological standards. By comparison, our sun, which is at its mid-life, is about 5 billion years old.

But here’s the thing: Younger stars tend to be more active, spewing out stronger magnetic fields, larger flares, and more intense X-ray emissions than their older counterparts. That’s why things are weird with WASP-18. The Chandra X-Ray Observatory explains:

Magnetic activity, flaring, and X-ray emission are linked to the star’s rotation, which generally declines with age. However, when astronomers took a long look with Chandra at WASP-18 they didn’t detect any X-rays. Using established relations between the magnetic activity and X-ray emission of stars, as well as its actual age, researchers determined WASP-18 is about 100 times less active than it should be.

"We think the planet is aging the star by wreaking havoc on its innards," said co-author Scott Wolk of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The researchers argue that tidal forces created by the gravitational pull of the massive planet – similar to those the moon has on Earth’s tides, but on a much larger scale – may have disrupted the magnetic field of the star. [emphasis added]

The strength of the magnetic field depends on the amount of convection in the star, or how intensely hot gas stirs the interior of the star.

"The planet’s gravity may cause motions of gas in the interior of the star that weaken the convection," said co-author Salvatore Sciortino also of INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo in Italy. "This has a domino effect that results in the magnetic field becoming weaker and the star to age prematurely."

WASP-18 is particularly vulnerable to the impact of tidal forces owing to its convection zone, which is narrower than most stars.

Read the entire study at the pre-print journal arXiv: “No X-rays from WASP-18. Implications for its age, activity, and the influence of its massive hot Jupiter”.

Image: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/I.Pillitteri et al; Optical: DSS; Illustration: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

At 19, I read a sentence that re-terraformed my head: “The level of matter in the universe has been constant since the Big Bang.”
In all the aeons we have lost nothing, we have gained nothing - not a speck, not a grain, not a breath. The universe is simply a sealed, twisting kaleidoscope that has reordered itself a trillion trillion trillion times over.
Each baby, then, is a unique collision - a cocktail, a remix - of all that has come before: made from molecules of Napoleon and stardust and comets and whale tooth; colloidal mercury and Cleopatra’s breath: and with the same darkness that is between the stars between, and inside, our own atoms.
When you know this, you suddenly see the crowded top deck of the bus, in the rain, as a miracle: this collection of people is by way of a starburst constellation. Families are bright, irregular-shaped nebulae. Finding a person you love is like galaxies colliding. We are all peculiar, unrepeatable, perambulating micro-universes - we have never been before and we will never be again. Oh God, the sheer exuberant, unlikely face of our existences. The honour of being alive. They will never be able to make you again. Don’t you dare waste a second of it thinking something better will happen when it ends. Don’t you dare.

Caitlin Moran  (via bruisinq)

(Source: lustsandluxuries)

sansalayned:

She had not thought of Jon in ages. He was only her half brother, but still… with Robb and Bran and Rickon dead, Jon Snow was the only brother that remained to her. I am a bastard too now, just like him. Oh, it would be so sweet, to see him once again.

Sansa and Jon AU reunion (requested by softvoicesdie.)

barricadeponine:

my parents definitely did not raise me to be a queer feminist filled with the wrath of a thousand enraged dragons and yet here i am

(Source: lesbianvenom)

If I give him sons, he may come to love me. She would name them Eddard and Brandon and Rickon, and raise them all to be as valiant as Ser Loras. And to hate Lannisters, too. In Sansa’s dreams, her children looked just like the brothers she had lost. Sometimes there was even a girl who looked like Arya.

“My mother says the same. She makes a posset for me, herbs and milk and ale, to help make me fertile. I drink it every morning. I told Robb I’m sure to give him twins. An Eddard and a Brandon. He liked that, I think. We … we try most every day, my lady. Sometimes twice or more.”

I would need to steal her if I wanted her love, but she might give me children. I might someday hold a son of my own blood in my arms. A son was something Jon Snow had never dared dream of, since he decided to live his life on the Wall. I could name him Robb.

Sansa, Jeyne, and Jon wishing to name children after Starks. (via jeynewaters)

(Source: saeratargaryen)

thekatitube:

DOES ANYONE ELSE GET LIKE REALLY HAPPY WHEN SOMEONE LEANS THEIR HEAD ON YOUR SHOULDER AND YOURE LIKE FUCK YEAH IVE BEEN CHOSEN AND YOU FEEL REALLY SPECIAL BUT THEN YOU HAVE TO STAY SO FUCKIBG STILL COS IF YOU MOVE THEYLL STOP LEANING ON YOU AND ITS LIKE NO COME BACK IM SORRRRYUWYY

bobbyhoying:

*makes typo*

*deletes typo*

*realize i like the aesthetic the typo gave to what i said so i put the typo back in*